Comments on: spec#: a framework I can get behind http://nomorehacks.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/spec-a-framework-i-can-get-behind/ Leaving hacking behind, trying to become a software engineer. Fri, 02 Oct 2009 07:49:41 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: test0191 http://nomorehacks.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/spec-a-framework-i-can-get-behind/#comment-24 test0191 Tue, 13 May 2008 20:35:55 +0000 http://nomorehacks.wordpress.com/?p=9#comment-24 Ah. That is a fair comment. The language is already very large and adding to the *language* rather than adding new libraries is maybe not a great idea. The question is, are enough people after programming by contract and declared exceptions? If so, maybe there is a way to implement them without adding to the language. Perhaps using attributes. Ah. That is a fair comment. The language is already very large and adding to the *language* rather than adding new libraries is maybe not a great idea.

The question is, are enough people after programming by contract and declared exceptions? If so, maybe there is a way to implement them without adding to the language. Perhaps using attributes.

]]> By: Spec#: should we really wait for it? | The .Net frog http://nomorehacks.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/spec-a-framework-i-can-get-behind/#comment-23 Spec#: should we really wait for it? | The .Net frog Tue, 13 May 2008 18:10:57 +0000 http://nomorehacks.wordpress.com/?p=9#comment-23 [...] friend of mine just posted about his desire to have Spec# ready for production. Funnily, many people in Alt.net [...] [...] friend of mine just posted about his desire to have Spec# ready for production. Funnily, many people in Alt.net [...]

]]>